WEKO3
アイテム
『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－
https://doi.org/10.24792/0002000544
https://doi.org/10.24792/0002000544b9a775c0-8597-4602-a361-a4bf9f597d46
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
01 『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－.pdf (1.6 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2024-04-12 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | 『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－ | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | A review and inquiry into the comments on the Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi 二刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas ： second series）, along with comparisons of Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi 初刻五種伝奇（Five traditional dramas ： first series） and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi 三刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas ： third series） | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| ID登録 | ||||||
| ID登録 | 10.24792/0002000544 | |||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||
| 著者 |
樊, 可人
× 樊, 可人 |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | After reviewing the characteristics of the frequently used comments “Hao 好 （good）,” “Miao 妙 （wonderful）,” and “Hua 画 （vivid）” as well as their correlations with other comments on the Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi 初刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : first series） and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi 三刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : third series）, this paper presents an analysis of the frequently used comments in a sequel, which is considered to have been published as Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi 二刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : second series） between Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi. If we take Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi, Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi, and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi as a whole, we can see that the comment Hua has shifted from the disunity of Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi to the unity of Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi. However, even if this change in Hua can be observed, it is still difficult to accurately distinguish the usage criteria of ao, Miao and Hua. Based on the annotations related to proofreading in Jingchaijii 荊釵記（The Thorn Hairpin） and the records left by Li Zhuowu 李卓吾 and his acquaintances, the author suspects that there are multiple versions of these dramas titled “Li Zhuowu Critique 李卓吾批評,” and due to the possible piracy of multiple versions, some general review of the end of some scenes are missing. This also directly leads to peopleʼs inability to clarify the perspectives from which comments on the highlights of criticism such as Hao and Miao are based. In addition, it could be inferred from the records stated above that there should be changes to the original text of the dramas that Li Zhuowu personally criticized, and the comments should be more logical. |
|||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 人文研究 en : Studies in humanities 巻 211, p. 1-22, 発行日 2024-03-26 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0287-7074 | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00123041 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 神奈川大学人文学会 | |||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | The Society of Humanities at Kanagawa University | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
