{"created":"2024-04-12T01:14:40.889301+00:00","id":2000544,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"a19c4158-f50a-4dbe-b3cd-0fb2742f7a00"},"_deposit":{"created_by":10,"id":"2000544","owners":[10],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000544"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kanagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000544","sets":["1176:1177:1178:1712726607858"]},"author_link":["35788"],"control_number":"2000544","item_3_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2024-03-26","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"211","bibliographicPageEnd":"22","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"人文研究","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"Studies in humanities","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_3_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"After reviewing the characteristics of the frequently used comments “Hao 好 （good）,” “Miao 妙 （wonderful）,” and “Hua 画 （vivid）” as well as their correlations with other comments on the Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi 初刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : first series） and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi 三刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : third series）, this paper presents an analysis of the frequently used comments in a sequel, which is considered to have been published as Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi 二刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas : second series） between Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi.\n　If we take Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi, Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi, and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi as a whole, we can see that the comment Hua has shifted from the disunity of Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi to the unity of Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi. However, even if this change in Hua can be observed, it is still difficult to accurately distinguish the usage criteria of ao, Miao and Hua. Based on the annotations related to proofreading in Jingchaijii 荊釵記（The Thorn Hairpin） and the records left by Li Zhuowu 李卓吾 and his acquaintances, the author suspects that there are multiple versions of these dramas titled “Li Zhuowu Critique 李卓吾批評,” and due to the possible piracy of multiple versions, some general review of the end of some scenes are missing. This also directly leads to peopleʼs inability to clarify the perspectives from which comments on the highlights of criticism such as Hao and Miao are based.\n　In addition, it could be inferred from the records stated above that there should be changes to the original text of the dramas that Li Zhuowu personally criticized, and the comments should be more logical.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_3_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.24792/0002000544","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_3_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"神奈川大学人文学会","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"The Society of Humanities at Kanagawa University","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_3_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AN00123041","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"0287-7074","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_3_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"樊, 可人","creatorNameLang":"ja"},{"creatorName":"ハン, カジン","creatorNameLang":"ja-Kana"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2024-04-12"}],"filename":"01 『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"1.6 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://kanagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000544/files/01 『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－.pdf"},"version_id":"49392af0-39f3-4e18-942a-094e1a278cfb"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"A review and inquiry into the comments on the Erke Wuzhong Chuanqi 二刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas ： second series）, along with comparisons of Chuke Wuzhong Chuanqi 初刻五種伝奇（Five traditional dramas ： first series） and Sanke Wuzhong Chuanqi 三刻五種伝奇 （Five traditional dramas ： third series）","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"10","path":["1712726607858"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2024-04-12"},"publish_date":"2024-04-12","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000544","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["『二刻五種伝奇』における評語について －『初刻五種伝奇』『三刻五種伝奇』との比較を兼ねて－"],"weko_creator_id":"10","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2024-04-17T04:20:16.392352+00:00"}