WEKO3
アイテム
Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review ： a Comparative Approach
http://hdl.handle.net/10487/00017541
http://hdl.handle.net/10487/0001754126a1f204-1e42-42e3-9bd1-9cfb3fe33e53
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
11 Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review ： a Comparative Approach (12.4 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2022-01-18 | |||||
| タイトル | ||||||
| タイトル | Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review ： a Comparative Approach | |||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 言語 | ||||||
| 言語 | eng | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | constitutionalism | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | constitutional courts | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | adjudication | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | judges | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | judicial review | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | human rights | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | constitutionalism | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | constitutional courts | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | adjudication | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | judges | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | judicial review | |||||
| キーワード | ||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||
| 主題 | human rights | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||
| 著者 |
Mousourakis, George
× Mousourakis, George |
|||||
| 抄録 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||
| 内容記述 | The nature and scope of judicial power lies at the centre of contemporary constitutional debate in many countries around the world. In some jurisdictions. constitutional reform has transferred considerable power from representative institutions to judicialau thorities. notably constitutional courts. which are entrusted with the task of safeguarding core values and fundamental human rights. The present work explores how countries belonging to different legal traditions approach the issue of judicial power and assesses whether New Zealand should reform its judiciary's institutional design along the lines of models adopted in other countries Part I provides a brief overview of the constitutional role of the courts and the function of constitutional review. Part II compares centrailzed and diffused systems of constitutional review. with particular reference to the German Federal Constitutional Court. the South African Constitutional Court and New Zealand's constitutional review system. Part III assesses these different structures of constitutional review and their impact on judicial empowerment. Folowing this comparative analysis. the author's thoughts concerning the desirability and feasibility of estabilshing a New Zealand Constitutional Court are outlined in Part IV of the work. Drawing on Philip Joseph's notion of' collaborative enterprise' ,1) the present paper argues that the political and judicial branches should work together to safeguard democracy and the values of the rule of law.2) Judges should respect Parliament's democratic mandate to legislate while Parliament should recognize the courts' duty to check that the political authorities do not abuse their powers and violate the constitutionally protected rights of citizens. 3) In a democratic system of government. the judiciary plays a key role in preserving the constitutional balance and ensuring government under the law. 4) In such a system, tensions between the political and judicial branches of government are both healthy and necessary to ensure that constitutional issues are handled with due rigour and earnestness. | |||||
| 内容記述 | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | 論説 | |||||
| 書誌情報 |
ja : 神奈川法学 en : KANAGAWA LAW REVIEW 巻 51, 号 3, p. 21-56, 発行日 2019-06-30 |
|||||
| ISSN | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | ISSN | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | 0453-185X | |||||
| 書誌レコードID | ||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | NCID | |||||
| 収録物識別子 | AN00043725 | |||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | 神奈川大学法学会 | |||||
| 出版者 | ||||||
| 出版者 | THE SOCIETY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF KANAGAWA | |||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||
| 内容記述 | Departmental Bulletin Paper | |||||
