ログイン
言語:

WEKO3

  • トップ
  • ランキング
To
lat lon distance
To

Field does not validate



インデックスリンク

インデックスツリー

メールアドレスを入力してください。

WEKO

One fine body…

WEKO

One fine body…

アイテム

  1. E0100 神奈川大学 法学会
  2. 03 紀要論文
  3. 01 神奈川法学
  4. 05103 51巻3号

Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review : a Comparative Approach

http://hdl.handle.net/10487/00017541
http://hdl.handle.net/10487/00017541
26a1f204-1e42-42e3-9bd1-9cfb3fe33e53
名前 / ファイル ライセンス アクション
11 11 Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review : a Comparative Approach (12.4 MB)
Item type 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1)
公開日 2022-01-18
タイトル
タイトル Legality, Constitutionalism and the Role of Judicial Review : a Comparative Approach
言語 en
言語
言語 eng
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 constitutionalism
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 constitutional courts
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 adjudication
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 judges
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 judicial review
キーワード
主題Scheme Other
主題 human rights
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 constitutionalism
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 constitutional courts
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 adjudication
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 judges
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 judicial review
キーワード
言語 en
主題Scheme Other
主題 human rights
資源タイプ
資源タイプ識別子 http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
資源タイプ departmental bulletin paper
著者 Mousourakis, George

× Mousourakis, George

WEKO 36633

Mousourakis, George

Search repository
抄録
内容記述タイプ Abstract
内容記述 The nature and scope of judicial power lies at the centre of contemporary constitutional debate in many countries around the world. In some jurisdictions. constitutional reform has transferred considerable power from representative institutions to judicialau thorities. notably constitutional courts. which are entrusted with the task of safeguarding core values and fundamental human rights. The present work explores how countries belonging to different legal traditions approach the issue of judicial power and assesses whether New Zealand should reform its judiciary's institutional design along the lines of models adopted in other countries Part I provides a brief overview of the constitutional role of the courts and the function of constitutional review. Part II compares centrailzed and diffused systems of constitutional review. with particular reference to the German Federal Constitutional Court. the South African Constitutional Court and New Zealand's constitutional review system. Part III assesses these different structures of constitutional review and their impact on judicial empowerment. Folowing this comparative analysis. the author's thoughts concerning the desirability and feasibility of estabilshing a New Zealand Constitutional Court are outlined in Part IV of the work. Drawing on Philip Joseph's notion of' collaborative enterprise' ,1) the present paper argues that the political and judicial branches should work together to safeguard democracy and the values of the rule of law.2) Judges should respect Parliament's democratic mandate to legislate while Parliament should recognize the courts' duty to check that the political authorities do not abuse their powers and violate the constitutionally protected rights of citizens. 3) In a democratic system of government. the judiciary plays a key role in preserving the constitutional balance and ensuring government under the law. 4) In such a system, tensions between the political and judicial branches of government are both healthy and necessary to ensure that constitutional issues are handled with due rigour and earnestness.
内容記述
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 論説
書誌情報 ja : 神奈川法学
en : KANAGAWA LAW REVIEW

巻 51, 号 3, p. 21-56, 発行日 2019-06-30
ISSN
収録物識別子タイプ ISSN
収録物識別子 0453-185X
書誌レコードID
収録物識別子タイプ NCID
収録物識別子 AN00043725
著者版フラグ
出版タイプ VoR
出版タイプResource http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
出版者
出版者 神奈川大学法学会
出版者
出版者 THE SOCIETY OF LAW, UNIVERSITY OF KANAGAWA
資源タイプ
内容記述タイプ Other
内容記述 Departmental Bulletin Paper
戻る
0
views
See details
Views

Versions

Ver.1 2023-05-15 13:42:54.559925
Show All versions

Share

Mendeley Twitter Facebook Print Addthis

Cite as

エクスポート

OAI-PMH
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 2.0
  • OAI-PMH JPCOAR 1.0
  • OAI-PMH DublinCore
  • OAI-PMH DDI
Other Formats
  • JSON
  • BIBTEX

Confirm


Powered by WEKO3


Powered by WEKO3