{"created":"2023-09-27T06:11:52.300901+00:00","id":2000120,"links":{},"metadata":{"_buckets":{"deposit":"95284656-3d0e-40c6-8248-16f8c69561cf"},"_deposit":{"created_by":10,"id":"2000120","owner":"10","owners":[10],"pid":{"revision_id":0,"type":"depid","value":"2000120"},"status":"published"},"_oai":{"id":"oai:kanagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:02000120","sets":["660:661:676:1695626320427"]},"author_link":["33787","33787"],"control_number":"2000120","item_3_biblio_info_7":{"attribute_name":"書誌情報","attribute_value_mlt":[{"bibliographicIssueDates":{"bibliographicIssueDate":"2023-03-20","bibliographicIssueDateType":"Issued"},"bibliographicIssueNumber":"26","bibliographicPageEnd":"21","bibliographicPageStart":"1","bibliographic_titles":[{"bibliographic_title":"非文字資料研究 = The study of nonwritten cultural materials","bibliographic_titleLang":"ja"},{"bibliographic_title":"The study of nonwritten cultural materials","bibliographic_titleLang":"en"}]}]},"item_3_description_4":{"attribute_name":"抄録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"本稿では、首里城（沖縄県那覇市）の正殿正面石階段上り口両側にたっていた大龍柱の本来の向きについて検討している。戦後復元された大龍柱は2019年の火災で損傷したため、今回あらためて復元設置されることになった。この令和復元でも、向きは「暫定」とされながらも相対とする方針が決められている。しかし、琉球国末期の1877年、大龍柱は正面向きだった。本稿では相対説が根拠資料を誤読していることを示し、大龍柱の本来の向きは正面であることを確認した。　現在、首里城と呼ばれている琉球国時代の王城・御城は1879（明治12）年、「琉球処分」で日本政府に接収された。接収後は1945（昭和20）年の沖縄戦で、日米両軍の戦闘によって壊滅的に破壊された。戦後は琉球大学に利用された後、沖縄の日本「復帰」20年を記念し、1992年に正殿などから復元公開された（平成復元）。復元が全域で完成したのは2019年だった。しかし同年10月31日未明、正殿から出火し関連9施設が焼失している。　平成復元で大龍柱は、相対向きで設置されていた。この相対向き復元には、本来の姿は正面向きだと当初から強い異論が出されていた。相対向きの根拠は「百浦添御殿普請付御絵図并御材木寸法記」（1768年、沖縄県立芸術大学蔵、「寸法記」）と尚家文書「百浦添御普請絵図帳」（1846年、那覇市蔵、「御普請絵図帳」）で大龍柱が相対向きに描かれたイラストだった。令和の復元でも、「寸法記」などが根拠とされている。しかし、2019年の首里城火災後に確認されたルヴェルトガ写真（1877年撮影）で、琉球国末期には正面向きだったことが確定した。これに対し、令和復元の在り方を検討する国の「首里城復元に向けた技術検討委員会（委員長・高良倉吉）」は2021年12月、令和復元でも「暫定」としながら相対向きとする方針を発表した。　琉球国末期の1877年、大龍柱の向きは正面だった。そのため「寸法記（1768年）」と「御普請絵図帳（1846年）」のイラストを相対向きの根拠とする相対説は、1846年から1877年までの間で、正面への変更の事実がなければ成立しない。そして、その間の向き変更の事実は確認されていない。向き変更が存在しないなら、「寸法記」イラストから相対向きを読み取った相対説の理解は誤りとなる。本稿では、その前提を踏まえつつあらためて、大龍柱相対向きの根拠「寸法記」イラストについて検討した。　相対説は「寸法記」イラストが大龍柱の向きの実態を正しく描いていると主張してきた。しかし、「寸法記」イラスト24点を分析すれば、オンスケールでないだけでなく、それぞれの目的に応じて作成されている。相対説の根拠イラスト2点は、当時の大龍柱を実測しそのデータを基にしたものではない。大龍柱は計測・縮尺に基づかない「絵」である。一定の計測と縮尺などに基づかない「絵」が、実際の形態を明らかにする決定的根拠にはならない。本稿ではイラストが、大龍柱の形状を正確に記録することを目的にしていないことを確認した。　「寸法記」イラストは、大龍柱が1768年に相対向きだったことを示す根拠にはならない。つまり、「寸法記」イラストに描かれた大龍柱の実際の姿は1768年も正面向きだった。それ故に大龍柱は1877年に正面向きでルヴェルトガ写真におさまったのである。","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"},{"subitem_description":"This paper examines the true orientation of the dragon pillars of Shuri Castle located in the city of Naha, Okinawa Prefecture.　Dairyuchu, as the two pillars are called, flank the stone steps ascending to the front entrance of the castleʼs Seiden, or main building. The pillars, reconstructed after World War II, were destroyed in 2019 by fire and are now being rebuilt. This latest　Reiwa-era reconstruction project has decided, albeit provisionally, to place the pillars facing each other, even though at the end of the Ryukyu Kingdom, in 1877, each pillar stood facing front. This paper establishes that the pillarsʼ correct orientation is face front by showing how the theory that Dairyuchu stood facing each other, or the face-to-face theory, misinterprets the evidence　supporting it.　The former palace of the Ryukyu Kingdom, currently known as Shuri Castle, was seized during the kingdomʼ annexation by the Japanese government in 1879. The castle, ravaged during the 1945 Battle of Okinawa between the forces of Japan and the United States, was temporarily used as the Ryukyu University site after the war. It later underwent another reconstruction （the Heisei reconstruction project） and, in commemoration of the 20th anniversary of Okinawaʼs ‶return\" to Japan, was opened to the public section by section, starting with Seiden in 1992. The resurrection of the entire palace was completed in 2019, but in the same year nine of its facilities were burned down on October 31 by an early-morning fire that broke out from Seiden.　The Heisei reconstruction project placed the pillars facing each other, which drew strong objections from the start that they should in fact face front. The face-to-face configuration was based on the 1768 drawings of Momoura soeudon fushinnitsuki miezu narabini ozaimoku sunpouki （‶Sunpouki\"）held by the Okinawa Prefectural University of Arts and on the Momoura soe gofushin ezucho（‶Gofushin ezucho\"） illustration in the 1846 Sho family document owned by the city of Naha. The Reiwa reconstruction project also claims to have referred to drawings such as Sunpouki. However, the photographs taken in 1877 by Jules Joseph Gabriel Revertegat, discovered after the 2019 fire, proves that the pillars actually stood face front in the final years of the Ryukyu Kingdom. In spite of this, the governmentʼs Technical Review Committee for the Reconstruction of Shuri Castle, a committee responsible for guiding the Reiwa reconstruction project, chaired by Kurayoshi Takara, announced in December 2021 its provisional decision to set the pillars facing each other.　In 1877, near the end of the Ryukyu Kingdom, Dairyuchu stood face front. This means the faceto-face theory, based on the 1768 Sunpouki and 1846 Gofushin Ezucho drawings, holds true only if the pillars were rotated to face front at some point between the years 1846 and 1877. Yet there is no evidence to suggest this happened. If the pillars were never rotated, then the interpretation of the Sunpouki drawings, and the face-to-face theory predicated on this interpretation, must be wrong. With this premise in mind, this paper reevaluated the Sunpouki drawings used to support the face-to-face theory.　The face-to-face theory claims the Sunpouki drawings accurately depict the pillarsʼ orientation. But close scrutiny of the 24 drawings reveals they are not to scale and each is made to fit a distinct　objective. The two drawings used as the theoryʼs basis, in particular, were not created based on data obtained through physically measuring the pillars ; they are merely sketches representative of neither measurements nor scale. Sketches as such cannot be considered as sufficient grounds for determining the precise features of an object. This paper confirms that the drawings　in question were not made with the aim of accurately depicting Dairyuchu.　The Sunpouki illustrations fail as evidence that the pillars stood facing each other in 1768. In other words, Dairyuchu portrayed in Sunpouki in 1768 had in reality stood facing front, which is why the pillars appear that way in Revertegatʼs photographs taken in 1877.","subitem_description_language":"en","subitem_description_type":"Abstract"}]},"item_3_description_5":{"attribute_name":"内容記述","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_description":"論文","subitem_description_language":"ja","subitem_description_type":"Other"}]},"item_3_identifier_registration":{"attribute_name":"ID登録","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_identifier_reg_text":"10.24792/0002000120","subitem_identifier_reg_type":"JaLC"}]},"item_3_publisher_33":{"attribute_name":"出版者","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_publisher":"神奈川大学日本常民文化研究所　非文字資料研究センター","subitem_publisher_language":"ja"},{"subitem_publisher":"Research Center for Nonwritten Cultural Materials, Institute for the Study of Japanese Folk Culture, Kanagawa University","subitem_publisher_language":"en"}]},"item_3_source_id_10":{"attribute_name":"書誌レコードID","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"AA12776889","subitem_source_identifier_type":"NCID"}]},"item_3_source_id_8":{"attribute_name":"ISSN","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_source_identifier":"2432-5481","subitem_source_identifier_type":"PISSN"}]},"item_3_version_type_16":{"attribute_name":"著者版フラグ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_version_resource":"http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85","subitem_version_type":"VoR"}]},"item_creator":{"attribute_name":"著者","attribute_type":"creator","attribute_value_mlt":[{"creatorNames":[{"creatorName":"後田多, 敦","creatorNameLang":"ja"}],"nameIdentifiers":[{},{}]}]},"item_files":{"attribute_name":"ファイル情報","attribute_type":"file","attribute_value_mlt":[{"accessrole":"open_access","date":[{"dateType":"Available","dateValue":"2023-09-27"}],"filename":"01 首里城大龍柱の本来の向きと「寸法記」イラストの検討 －相対説はなぜ根拠イラストを誤読したのか－.pdf","filesize":[{"value":"17.5 MB"}],"format":"application/pdf","mimetype":"application/pdf","url":{"url":"https://kanagawa-u.repo.nii.ac.jp/record/2000120/files/01 首里城大龍柱の本来の向きと「寸法記」イラストの検討 －相対説はなぜ根拠イラストを誤読したのか－.pdf"},"version_id":"f17e8e16-df1f-48fc-a8d9-c05674f87375"}]},"item_language":{"attribute_name":"言語","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_language":"jpn"}]},"item_resource_type":{"attribute_name":"資源タイプ","attribute_value_mlt":[{"resourcetype":"departmental bulletin paper","resourceuri":"http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501"}]},"item_title":"首里城大龍柱の本来の向きと「寸法記」イラストの検討 －相対説はなぜ根拠イラストを誤読したのか－","item_titles":{"attribute_name":"タイトル","attribute_value_mlt":[{"subitem_title":"首里城大龍柱の本来の向きと「寸法記」イラストの検討 －相対説はなぜ根拠イラストを誤読したのか－","subitem_title_language":"ja"},{"subitem_title":"A Study on the True Orientation of Shuri Castleʼs Dairyuchu, or Dragon Pillars, and the Sunpouki Drawings －Why the Face-to-Face Theory Misinterprets the Evidence Drawings－","subitem_title_language":"en"}]},"item_type_id":"3","owner":"10","path":["1695626320427"],"pubdate":{"attribute_name":"PubDate","attribute_value":"2023-09-27"},"publish_date":"2023-09-27","publish_status":"0","recid":"2000120","relation_version_is_last":true,"title":["首里城大龍柱の本来の向きと「寸法記」イラストの検討 －相対説はなぜ根拠イラストを誤読したのか－"],"weko_creator_id":"10","weko_shared_id":-1},"updated":"2023-10-05T00:00:47.061788+00:00"}